All fifty states require breach notification and none of them agree on the deadline, the trigger, or the regulator threshold. This hub tracks amendments to those rules and the enforcement that follows late or inadequate notice.

Breach Notification

A.R.S. 18-552: Arizona's Investigation Duty, a 45-Day Clock and a $500,000 Penalty Ceiling

November 9, 2026

Arizona's breach article opens with a duty to investigate any security incident, then gives the data owner 45 days from the determination that a breach occurred. Above 1,000 individuals, filings go to three credit bureaus, the Attorney General and the state homeland security director. Only the Attorney General may enforce, under a penalty ceiling of $500,000.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Louisiana R.S. 51:3074: A Security Duty, a 60-Day Limit and an Attorney General Extension Route

November 9, 2026

Louisiana's breach chapter imposes a reasonable security duty and a record destruction duty before it reaches notice. Residents are told within 60 days of discovery, unless written reasons for delay reach the Attorney General inside that window. A separate regulation requires the Attorney General's copy within 10 days of resident notice, and R.S. 51:3075 allows a suit for actual damages.

Read more →
Breach Notification

North Carolina G.S. 75-65: Notice for Records in Any Form and a Report to the Attorney General Each Time

November 9, 2026

North Carolina's Identity Theft Protection Act does not limit its breach duty to computers: section 75-65 reaches personal information in any form. Every business that notifies a person also reports to the Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division, with no minimum count, and a violation is an unfair practice under G.S. 75-1.1, with private suits reserved for those injured.

Read more →
Breach Notification

South Carolina's Section 39-1-90: Consumer Affairs, a $1,000-Per-Resident Fine and a Private Suit

November 9, 2026

South Carolina's private-sector breach statute names the Department of Consumer Affairs, not the Attorney General. Section 39-1-90 sends filings above 1,000 persons to that Department, gives it power to set a per-resident fine, and lets an injured resident sue. Its text reaches computerized or other data, though its definition of a breach mentions only computerized data.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Maine's Notice of Risk to Personal Data Act, 10 M.R.S. 1348: Two Triggers, a Scope-Based 30-Day Clock and a Regulator Split

November 2, 2026

Maine's breach chapter, the Notice of Risk to Personal Data Act, applies one notice trigger to information brokers and a misuse-based trigger to everyone else. Notice is due within 30 days of learning of a breach and identifying its scope, every notice is copied to a state regulator, and violations are civil violations with fines that do not reach public bodies.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Montana's Breach Statute, MCA 30-14-1704, and Its Insurance and State Agency Counterparts: Three Filing Routes

November 2, 2026

Montana has three parallel breach sections: MCA 30-14-1704 for persons and businesses, 33-19-321 for insurance licensees, and 2-6-1503 for state agencies. Each sends a copy of every resident notice to a state office, and none sets a day count. The general section is enforced through the Consumer Protection Act by the Department of Justice.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Ohio's Breach Statute, R.C. 1349.19: A 45-Day Ceiling, No State Filing and Escalating Daily Penalties

November 2, 2026

Ohio's private-sector breach law requires notice to residents within 45 days when an access-and-acquisition incident creates a material risk of identity theft or fraud. It names no state office to receive notice, sends a report to the national credit bureaus above 1,000 residents, and gives the Attorney General exclusive power to sue for penalties that rise with each day of noncompliance.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Wisconsin's Section 134.98: An Acquisition Statute With DNA and Biometrics, a 45-Day Limit and No Enforcer

November 2, 2026

Wisconsin's breach statute never uses the word breach. It requires notice when an entity knows personal information was acquired without authorization, counts DNA profiles and biometric data as personal information, and sets a 45-day limit. It names no enforcer and no penalty, and a federal court has held it creates no private right of action.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Nebraska's Breach Act, Sections 87-801 to 87-808: Investigate First, Then Tell Residents and the Attorney General

October 26, 2026

Nebraska's Financial Data Protection and Consumer Notification of Data Security Breach Act of 2006 requires a good-faith investigation before notice, routes every required notice to the Attorney General as well, offers a small-business newspaper option, and since 2018 carries a security duty enforced through the Consumer Protection Act.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Michigan's Breach Notice Law: MCL 445.72, the Risk-of-Harm Test and the Identity Theft Protection Act

October 19, 2026

Michigan's breach duty is section 12 of the Identity Theft Protection Act, MCL 445.72. It requires notice unless the entity determines, with ordinary prudence, that the breach is not likely to cause substantial loss, injury or identity theft. Insurers are carved out to a parallel regime in the Insurance Code, and Senate Bills 360 to 364 would add Attorney General notice.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Minnesota's Data Breach Notification Law: Section 325E.61 and Its Government Counterpart, Section 13.055

October 19, 2026

Minnesota's private-sector breach statute, Minn. Stat. 325E.61, has changed little since 2006. It requires notice to residents whose unencrypted personal information was or is reasonably believed acquired, without a risk-of-harm exception or a day count, adds a 48-hour credit bureau notice above 500 persons, and leaves government entities to a separate statute with its own rules.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Tennessee's Breach Notification Law: How Public Chapter 91 Rewrote Section 47-18-2107

October 19, 2026

Tennessee replaced its breach statute twice in two years. Public Chapter 692 of 2016 set a 45-day deadline and dropped the encryption exception; Public Chapter 91 of 2017 rewrote section 47-18-2107 in full, restoring encryption by reference to FIPS 140-2, keeping 45 days, adding a materiality test and a credit bureau duty, and keeping a customer's right to sue.

Read more →
Breach Notification

The FCC's Telecom Data Breach Reporting Rule: What FCC 23-111 Adopted, Why Its Core Amendments Are Not in Force, and Where the Sixth Circuit Stands

October 5, 2026

In December 2023 the FCC rewrote its carrier breach rule to reach personally identifiable information and inadvertent exposures, add itself as a recipient, and swap a mandatory waiting period for a 30-day limit. Those amendments still await an effective date, and on July 31, 2026 the Sixth Circuit vacated the panel decision upholding the order.

Read more →
Breach Notification

The Florida Information Protection Act: Section 501.171's Security Duty, Two 30-Day Clocks and an Enforcement Record That Stays Sealed

October 5, 2026

Florida's breach statute is section 501.171, created in 2014 by CS/CS/SB 1524 as the Florida Information Protection Act. It pairs a duty to take reasonable security measures with two 30-day notice clocks, one to residents and one to the Department of Legal Affairs at 500 people, and it treats a violation as a FDUTPA unfair practice with per-breach civil penalties capped at $500,000.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Virginia's Breach Notification Law: Section 18.2-186.6, a Public-Sector Medical Statute and Two Tax Data Rules

October 5, 2026

Virginia's breach statute sits in the criminal code at section 18.2-186.6 but is enforced civilly by the Attorney General, with penalties up to $150,000 per breach. Residents and the Attorney General get notice when identity theft or fraud is caused or reasonably believed likely. A medical statute reaches only public bodies, and payroll and tax preparer breaches have rules of their own.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Pennsylvania's Breach Notification Act: How a 2005 Statute Was Rebuilt by Act 151 of 2022 and Act 33 of 2024

September 28, 2026

Pennsylvania's breach statute is the Act of December 22, 2005, P.L. 474, No. 94. Senate Bill 696, enacted as Act 151 of 2022, rewrote its trigger and added duties for State agencies, contractors, counties, schools and municipalities. Senate Bill 824, enacted as Act 33 of 2024, added Attorney General notice and credit monitoring and quietly narrowed the medical information element.

Read more →
Data Security Rules

New York's SHIELD Act: The Section 899-bb Security Requirement and the Breach Law Changes Since 2019

September 14, 2026

The SHIELD Act of 2019 did two things: it widened New York's breach notification statute, General Business Law section 899-aa, and it added section 899-bb, a standalone duty to maintain reasonable data security. This sets out the security requirement as enacted, the routes to deemed compliance, and the three later chapters that changed section 899-aa without touching section 899-bb.

Read more →
Breach Notification

State Data Breach Notification Requirements, Compared Across 48 States

August 24, 2026

Every state has a breach notification statute, and no two set the same combination of deadline, regulator and threshold. This guide charts the individual-notice deadline and the regulator notice rule for the 48 states whose statutes are documented against a primary source in the research behind this site.

Read more →
Ransomware

Ransomware Notification: The Federal and Sectoral Obligations an Extortion Incident Triggers

August 24, 2026

A ransomware incident sets off obligations that sit outside the state breach statutes entirely. Encryption alone can be a reportable event under HIPAA before any record leaves the building, and the decision to pay opens a separate track running through sanctions law, bank secrecy reporting and securities disclosure. This guide charts those duties and where each clock starts.

Read more →
HIPAA

HIPAA in Practice: The Privacy, Security and Breach Notification Rules

August 12, 2026

HIPAA is three interlocking rules rather than one, and they apply to a defined set of organizations rather than to health information generally. This guide covers who is covered, what the Privacy Rule permits without authorization, what the Security Rule requires, how business associate liability works, and the mechanics of breach notification.

Read more →

Related pages