We track privacy and data protection developments across US federal and state law. Every article is reported from the underlying documents (statutes, agency orders, court filings and official registries) and links them so you can check the reporting yourself. We are not attorneys and none of this is legal advice. How we report.

Breach Notification

A.R.S. 18-552: Arizona's Investigation Duty, a 45-Day Clock and a $500,000 Penalty Ceiling

November 9, 2026

Arizona's breach article opens with a duty to investigate any security incident, then gives the data owner 45 days from the determination that a breach occurred. Above 1,000 individuals, filings go to three credit bureaus, the Attorney General and the state homeland security director. Only the Attorney General may enforce, under a penalty ceiling of $500,000.

Read more →
Breach Notification

Louisiana R.S. 51:3074: A Security Duty, a 60-Day Limit and an Attorney General Extension Route

November 9, 2026

Louisiana's breach chapter imposes a reasonable security duty and a record destruction duty before it reaches notice. Residents are told within 60 days of discovery, unless written reasons for delay reach the Attorney General inside that window. A separate regulation requires the Attorney General's copy within 10 days of resident notice, and R.S. 51:3075 allows a suit for actual damages.

Read more →
Employee Privacy

Louisiana's Personal Online Account Privacy Protection Act: Employers, Schools and La. R.S. 51:1951 to 51:1955

November 9, 2026

Louisiana's 2014 Personal Online Account Privacy Protection Act stops employers and educational institutions from asking for the login credentials to a personal online account. The definition of personal account is tightly drawn, the employer exceptions are longer than the school ones, and the chapter's only liability section limits exposure.

Read more →
Genetic Privacy

Louisiana R.S. 22:1023: The Genetic Information Insurance Law, Its $50,000 Floor and the Doe Decision

November 9, 2026

La. R.S. 22:1023 is a health insurance statute with reach beyond underwriting. It restricts insurers' use of genetic information, requires detailed signed authorizations, treats an insured's genetic information as property, and creates statutory damages of at least $50,000 or $100,000. A 2015 appellate decision read it to reach a diagnostic code inside an insurer's own systems.

Read more →
Breach Notification

North Carolina G.S. 75-65: Notice for Records in Any Form and a Report to the Attorney General Each Time

November 9, 2026

North Carolina's Identity Theft Protection Act does not limit its breach duty to computers: section 75-65 reaches personal information in any form. Every business that notifies a person also reports to the Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division, with no minimum count, and a violation is an unfair practice under G.S. 75-1.1, with private suits reserved for those injured.

Read more →
Breach Notification

South Carolina's Section 39-1-90: Consumer Affairs, a $1,000-Per-Resident Fine and a Private Suit

November 9, 2026

South Carolina's private-sector breach statute names the Department of Consumer Affairs, not the Attorney General. Section 39-1-90 sends filings above 1,000 persons to that Department, gives it power to set a per-resident fine, and lets an injured resident sue. Its text reaches computerized or other data, though its definition of a breach mentions only computerized data.

Read more →
Genetic Privacy

South Carolina's Genetic Information Privacy Chapter: S.C. Code 38-93 and Its Stacked Remedies

November 9, 2026

South Carolina's Chapter 93 of Title 38 regulates genetic information in health coverage, but two of its sections are written without limiting them to insurers. It bars issuers from using genetic information in coverage decisions and requires informed consent for genetic tests. Violations can draw department fines, unfair trade practice exposure and a private action.

Read more →
Data Security Rules

South Carolina's Insurance Data Security Act: Chapter 38-99 Read Against the NAIC Model

November 9, 2026

South Carolina added Chapter 99 to Title 38 through 2018 Act No. 171, signed May 3, 2018 and effective January 1, 2019, and its Department of Insurance describes it as the first enactment of the NAIC data security model. The chapter tracks the model closely, so its interest lies in the places where the wording, the timing and the later amendments part from it.

Read more →